HUOT
I first became acquainted with Robert Huot in the late 1970s,
while doing research for a book on avant-garde film. I learned
that he was living in central New York State, not far, as
it turned out, from where I lived, near Utica. I made arrangements
for a visit, and a private screening, and found my way to
Huot’s farm near New Berlin. Huot himself had great
physical presence and considerable charm, and as he showed
me around his big, old, three-story farmhouse, I was surprised
to realize that he was clearly a mature painter with a long
enough history to have worked through several productive
phases. I was to learn more about his painting and his other
art activities as the years went by, but on this afternoon,
the focus was one of the 16mm diary films Huot had been
making since 1970. I don’t know what I expected to
see; I was just following a lead that I assumed wouldn’t
take me very far, cinematically at least. But what I discovered
was film unlike any I’d seen to that point, an aggressively
personal film shot with formal rigor and elegance and organized
into an ingenious structure.
I
asked Huot if he had other films, and at the end of the
afternoon, he sent me home with a pile of them. That night,
in my office/screening room, I projected Rolls: 1971 and
was astonished, as Huot’s sense of timing and ingenious
compositions seemed to transform my space into his. Huot’s
first diary films – One Year 1970 (1971), Rolls: 1971
(1972), and Third One-Year Movie - 1972 (1973)- remain landmark
contributions, not merely to the avant-garde genre of the
diary film but to modern independent cinema.¹
In
the years following my first meeting with Huot, I took the
opportunity to explore the work he had done before he began
as a film-diarist, and I’ve done my best to keep up
with the work he’s done since. It’s become clear
to me that Huot’s productive filmmaking years, and
in the 1990’s returned to painting with renewed excitement.
Huot’s
involvement with painting began in the mid-1950s, when he
was a student (and chemistry major) at Wagner College on
Staten Island. As result of the influence of Wagner teacher/artist,
Tom Young, Huot, still a teenager, found his way to the
Cedar Bar on University Place off 8th Street in New York,
where a vital art scene had developed around abstract expressionism.
Huot hung out with Franz Kline and other important artists.
After graduation from Wagner, and two-year stint in the
army (1958-1960), Huot moved into Manhattan, where he supported
himself by working as a pigment chemist and studied for
a time at Hunter College with Fritz Bultman and George Sugarman.
By 1964, he had several significant one-man shows, first
at Stephan Radich Gallery and subsequently at Paula Cooper,
as well as in West Germany and Switzerland.
During
the 1960s, Huot’s art practice underwent continual evolution.
Beginning as an abstract expressionist (from 1956-1961), Huot
soon began to react “to the idiosyncratic gestures of
our art fathers.” ² By the mid 1960s, he was questioning
the conventional shape of painting in a variety of rigorously
formal ways. For the Spring Line series, e.g., Huot used the
module of the square to structure paintings that stretch into
long, narrow, horizontal, subtly-balanced two- and three-part
canvases-premonitions of his later work with 16mm filmstrip.
His work became increasingly minimal until, at the end of
the decade, political concerns-a revulsion to the Vietnam
War in particular, and accumulating doubts about the way art-making
functioned in society – led to his involvement with
the

Two Blue Walls
Sanded Floor Coated with Polyutethane
March-April 1969
Paula Cooper
|
Art Workers Coalition and to conceptual
pieces that abjured the discreet, saleable artwork altogether.³
Working with strips of tape, slightly modifying architectural
details in the living spaces of friends, making sand paintings
at night and sweeping them up before anyone saw them, painting
two walls of the Paula Cooper gallery blue and coating the
sanded floor with polyurethane, Huot searched for ways to
work as an artist with Huot participating in the commerce
of art, which seemed to continue oblivious of larger political
developments. Finally, Huot’s interest in making art
that was virtually invisible led to his own disappearing act:
he bought a farm in central New York and, with his spouse,
Twyla Tharp, moved into the farmhouse to reconnoiter.
The rhythms of the farm forced Huot out of his city sense
of time and into new ways of thinking about art. In 1966,
Huot met Hollis Frampton,

Robert
Huot and Hollis Frampton - 1972 |
whose interest in film and willingness
to share what he knew with Huot, helped enter the arena of
filmmaking.4 During the late 1960s,
Huot successfully brought his minimalist/conceptual aesthetic
to celluloid, with inventive results: he scratched into the
emulsion (for Scratch, 1967), spray painted strips of clear
leader (for Spray, 1967), embedded a single frame of photographed
imagery – a close-up of a woman’s crotch –
within several minutes of monochrome red (Red Stockings, 1969);
against a black background, recorded a nude white woman slowly
covering herself with black paint (Black and White Film, 1969),
and paid homage to Duchamp (Nude Descending the Stairs, 1970).
At the farm, however, Huot’s filmmaking and his painting
took a different turn. Far from the requirement of performing
for the New York City art world, Huot began to perform for
himself, in order to clarify who he was. If his performance
Wall, presented in 1968 at the Angry Arts Festival where “Having
placed a white wall on stage, he demonstrated its strength
by having a performer fling a hard rubber ball at it. Suddenly,
a burly figure (Huot) burst through the wall [toward the audience]
in a physical demonstration of the power of determination”5,
represents the volatile, super-energized Huot of the 1960s,
the opening of Third One-Year Diary-1972, where we see Huot
taking a shower in a long, slow, continuous shot epitomizes
the new, more valnerable, more serene Huot of the 1970s, candidly
exposing the day-to-day realities of his life, washing away
the past, beginning anew. For
a time, Huot worked back and forth between diary filmmaking
and diary painting: an extensive series of paintings made,
for the most part, on rolls of canvas.6
On a given day, a section of canvas a few feet long would
be exposed, Huot would paint on it, and when the paint was
dry, he would roll up the canvas, and expose a fresh section.
The results were generally eight feet wide and often sixty
feet and sometimes ninety feet long. In both the diary paintings
and the diary films, Huot explored what each new day might
bring: it might be a portrait, an exporation of the formal
properties of paint or filmstock, a bit of graffiti referring
to his chores on the farm (“mowed some more”.)
One he reached the end of the roll of canvas, or had exposed
his final roll of film for the year, he would discover the
structure that (in the paintings) had accumulated, or (in
the films) seemed demanded by what he had recorded. In both
painting and film, accidents, mistakes, “failures”
were included as part of the finished work – a gesture
of openness about the artistic process that complemented
Huot’s new openness about himself.
By
the end of the decade, Huot had become interested in Super-8
film because the narrower gauge was far less expensive to
work with than 16mm, and therefore a more democratic, popular
media-making alternative, also offering the opportunity
for working with sound. Beginning in 1978, Huot’s
diaristic impulse was channeled into elaborate Super-8 features
that revealed considerable dexterity with the new medium.
If Super-8 film never achieved the widespread recognition
that at first seemed likely (as a result of a combination
of factors: most obviously the refusal of exhibitors to
equip theaters with the first-rate Super-8 projection, and
later, the advent of accessible synch-sound video technology),
Huot’s Super-8 work from 1978 into the 1990s, and
specifically Super-8 Diary: 1979 (1980), Diary 1980 (1982),
1983 Diary for five projectors (1984), and Dark the Dominatrix
(1995) – stand with the best American narrow-gauge
work of the era.
The
Super-8 diaries, like the earlier diary paintings and films,
also provide a context for Huot’s other art activities,
including his collaboration with Twyla Tharp in Deuce Coupe
(1980, music by the Beach Boys), a series of anti-nuclear
posters he designed for exhibition in New York subway stations,
and in one instance, as a fund raiser for Peter Watkins’s
epic, transnational mass-media critique, The Journey (1987);
and a fascination with the equilateral triangle that, in
the 1990s, has drawn him back into painting.
In
the beginning, Huot’s interest in the triangle seemed
a function of the synergic implications of the form, utilized
in R. Buckminster Fuller’s geodesic dome. But the
triangle allowed Huot to combine several concerns that have
been characteristic of his work since the 1960s. In addition
to providing a dynamic frame within which he can –re-explore
painting, the equilateral triangle provides a module –
like the square in the Spring Line paintings, the film frame,
the daily space on the rolls of diary paintings –
that makes each new painting part of a series, an extension
of what’s gone before, an entry in an implicit diary
of artistic investigation. And because the triangle paintings
are potential modules, when they are grouped in a show,
as they are here, they re-form the gallery space into an
environment that feels as much like Huot’s own as
my home screening space became as I watched, in amazement,
those first 16mm diaries.
Scott
MacDonald
Professor Emeritus
Utica College of
Syracuse University
1
The form of the film diary is usually credited to Jonas
Mekas: see David E. James, “Film Diary/Diary Film:
Practice and Product in Walden[Mekas’s Walden],”
in James, ed., To Free the Cinema (Princeton University
Press, 1992), pp.145-179. I discuss Huot’s early diaries
in “Surprise! The films of Robert Huot: 1967 to 1972,”
Quarterly Review of Film Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Summer
1980), pp. 297-318. Huot and I discuss these films at some
length in our interview, which is included in A Critical
Cinema(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988),
pp. 90-115.
2
Huot, in brief catalogue essay for the Allianz 8 Gallery
in Stuttgart, Germany in 1980.
3
Several Huot pieces are discussed in Lucy Lippard’s
history of conceptual art, Six Years: The Dematerialization
of the Art object from 1966 to 1972 (London: Studio Vista,
1973).
4
The relationship between Huot and Frampton has never been
adequately appreciated.
Certainly
the relationship involved more than Frampton’s teaching
Huot the basics. Frampton’s Manual of Arms (1966)
includes a portrait of Huot, who also appears in Frampton’s
Artificial Light (1969). Frampton’s Lemon (1969) is
dedicated to Huot, whose farm is the location for the final
section of Zorns Lemma (1970), during which Huot is a member
of a threesome – man, woman, dog – who walk
across his pasture to the woods in the distance (Frampton
also alludes to Huot’s Two Blue Walls…, in the
central section of Zorns Lemma: Huot painting a wall is
a recurring image). Frampton appears a number of times in
One Year (1970) and in Third One-Year Movie – 1972,
and was cameraperson on Black and White Movie and Nude Descending
the stairs.
5
Don McDonagh, The Rise and Fall of Modern Dance (New York:
Outerbridge & Dienstfrey, 1970), pp. 310-311.
6
Lucy Lippard, Eunice Lipton, and Don McDonagh discuss the
diary paintings in the catalogue for Huot’s diary
show at the University Art Gallery at S.U.N.Y.-Albany in
1976.
|